← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #111,931,137
16 transactions · 15 stateful · 2026-10-09 15:24:07 UTC
Parallelism
88/100
Blocked
7%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.06
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #111,931,137 · 16 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
10w015w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x874cb67f…26db
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x9ebfbfd4…c18c
0xd32edf…ff58
3 touches
1 conflict
0x09106a95…1467
0x33176b…e078
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x3732c6c9…ded6
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x41689b03…0dbc
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x09000000…0001
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
1 conflict on slot 0x0000000000…000015
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity