← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #112,255,391
20 transactions · 17 stateful · 2026-10-10 18:35:35 UTC
Parallelism
75/100
Blocked
29%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.45
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #112,255,391 · 20 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w13w24w38w418w019w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd996735f…872e
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xc20c7155…9760
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0002
0x125f12…a50b
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0018
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0028
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0040
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000015
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity