pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#112,526,208
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #112,526,208
25 transactions · 19 stateful · 2026-10-11 17:18:08 UTC
Parallelism
80
/100
Blocked
47
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.6
Longest chain
5
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#112,526,208
· 25 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 4
#2
0x32d01e04
#3
0x00040000
#4
0x0000289c
#7
0x59558d29
#8
0x59558d29
#10
0x8a5c5f49
#13
execOrders
#14
execOrders
#15
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#16
exactInputSingle
#17
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 2
#19
0x84403c1b
#23
setData
#24
0x0c7abd22
#5
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 5
#21
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 1
#6
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#11
0x5acec890
· blocks 1
#18
0x84403c1b
#22
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#9
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#12
0x928e4afa
#20
0xed82b078
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
5
w1
6
w2
9
w3
11
w2
12
w3
17
w0
18
w2
20
w4
21
w1
22
w2
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x6235638c…643b
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xcb45d9d6…cb85
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…001d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…002d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x3bc3d239…1b75
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
0xc824469a…6425
0x34b655…2a6f
6 touches
3 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot
0x0000000000…000012
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity