pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#112,584,334
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #112,584,334
30 transactions · 29 stateful · 2026-10-11 22:10:35 UTC
Parallelism
87
/100
Blocked
24
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.37
Longest chain
4
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#112,584,334
· 30 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
#0
syscallReward
#1
0xbbb036a8
· blocks 1
#3
0x67098489
#4
0x32d01e04
· blocks 1
#6
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 3
#7
0x9ac0761c
· blocks 2
#9
0x59558d29
#10
execOrders
#11
execOrders
#12
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#14
setData
#15
0x61d59c2d
#16
execOrders
#17
execOrders
#18
execOrders
#19
execOrders
#20
execOrders
#21
execOrders
#22
execOrders
#23
execOrders
#24
execOrders
#25
execOrders
#26
execOrders
#2
0x575c0012
#5
0x32d01e04
#8
0x9ac0761c
· blocks 1
#27
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 2
#13
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#28
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#29
0x0c7abd22
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
4
w0
5
w1
6
w0
7
w0
8
w1
13
w2
27
w1
28
w2
29
w3
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x394c3833…b4ad
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x7839ac24…21fa
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
0x737acb78…fce8
0x34b655…2a6f
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x178fe051…465a
0x34b655…2a6f
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xac2a0273…721b
0x34b655…2a6f
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x3e1329b8…deca
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot
0x394c38330b…c9b4ad
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity