pev
.
One block, wave by wave
→
offline
by Silk Nodes →
pev
/
block
/
#71,289,228
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #71,289,228
10 transactions · 8 stateful · 2026-04-29 11:38:17 UTC
Parallelism
80
/100
Blocked
13
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.1
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#71,289,228
· 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
updatePrices
#2
0x98717539
#3
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#4
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#5
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#7
0xb0435a94
#8
approve
#9
setData
#6
0x0c7abd22
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
5
w0
6
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…001c
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xcb45d9d6…cb84
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xcc4e4db8…21e4
0xd32edf…ff58
3 touches
1 conflict
0x09000000…0001
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x09000000…0007
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x0b000000…0002
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
0x1b68626d…2de19c
1 conflict on slot
0x0000000000…000012
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity