← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #71,328,935
20 transactions · 17 stateful · 2026-04-29 16:02:54 UTC
Parallelism
80/100
Blocked
35%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.45
Longest chain
4 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #71,328,935 · 20 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
7w08w19w210w311w012w116w117w018w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x8a35acfb…d1ac
0x8d66a4…3095
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x60f7fbaf…bd58
0x34b655…2a6f
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…001d
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…002d
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xcd4d0c58…99c6
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Perpl: Oracle / Operator Hub
6 conflicts on slot 0x8a35acfbc1…6bd1ac
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity