← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #71,329,681
8 transactions · 7 stateful · 2026-04-29 16:07:52 UTC
Parallelism
75/100
Blocked
14%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.13
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #71,329,681 · 8 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
2w03w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xe89e1a22…ce49
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8a35acfb…d1ac
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…003d
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x348fda08…7e96
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x4d51d41d…87aa
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x91b4740d…b713
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xe743c20a…b906
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Perpl: Oracle / Operator Hub
1 conflict on slot 0xe89e1a2242…33ce49
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity