← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #71,557,219
10 transactions · 7 stateful · 2026-04-30 17:27:59 UTC
Parallelism
80/100
Blocked
14%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.1
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #71,557,219 · 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
6w08w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x8a35acfb…d1aa
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8a35acfb…d1ae
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x96504a63…52d2
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x7f430e47…4cbd
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00f245ce…1e10
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x15c9b5bf…f732
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x1dc86774…166a
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x01a89030…f786
0x98dc6e…8633
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Perpl: Oracle / Operator Hub
1 conflict on slot 0x8a35acfbc1…6bd1aa
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity