← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #72,232,890
9 transactions · 5 stateful · 2026-05-03 20:30:12 UTC
Parallelism
78/100
Blocked
20%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.11
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #72,232,890 · 9 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
4w05w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x7f430e47…4cbd
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8a35acfb…d1a8
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8a35acfb…d1ab
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0xe89e1a22…ce49
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x65e795ca…0320
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xea02471d…1539
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xfa2527aa…9dd5
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xfadc118d…5d64
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Perpl: Oracle / Operator Hub
1 conflict on slot 0x7f430e471f…4e4cbd
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity