← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #72,271,253
13 transactions · 12 stateful · 2026-05-04 00:48:02 UTC
Parallelism
85/100
Blocked
8%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.08
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #72,271,253 · 13 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
5w06w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x8a35acfb…d1a6
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8a35acfb…d1a8
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x60f7fbaf…bd58
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xcc6521c1…c892
0x8d66a4…3095
3 touches
1 conflict
0x6fdc73d3…9853
0x8d66a4…3095
3 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0018
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0028
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Perpl: Oracle / Operator Hub
1 conflict on slot 0x8a35acfbc1…6bd1a6
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity