← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #72,288,628
15 transactions · 11 stateful · 2026-05-04 02:44:49 UTC
Parallelism
87/100
Blocked
18%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.13
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #72,288,628 · 15 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
2w04w16w07w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x8a35acfb…d1a7
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8a35acfb…d1ac
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0xcc6521c1…c892
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x0d622e34…0000
0x681e90…ae09
4 touches
1 conflict
0x7f430e47…4cbd
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0018
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0028
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Perpl: Oracle / Operator Hub
1 conflict on slot 0x8a35acfbc1…6bd1a7
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity