← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #73,026,662
6 transactions · 5 stateful · 2026-05-07 12:41:56 UTC
Parallelism
67/100
Blocked
20%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.17
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #73,026,662 · 6 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xe937b6bc…8a5b
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x19b14a05…089d
0xd32edf…ff58
3 touches
1 conflict
0xcc0f5c41…1884
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x33018431…8f5c
0x188d58…ea8e
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…001f
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
1 conflict on slot 0x0000000000…000015
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity