← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #73,036,105
17 transactions · 10 stateful · 2026-05-07 13:44:49 UTC
Parallelism
88/100
Blocked
20%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.12
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #73,036,105 · 17 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w110w011w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x0a6cb118…4caa
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x60f7fbaf…bd58
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8a35acfb…d1ab
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0xe89e1a22…ce49
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x5048350d…180a
0xd32edf…ff58
3 touches
1 conflict
0x09000000…0001
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
1 conflict on slot 0x0a6cb11882…264caa
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity