pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#73,037,507
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #73,037,507
10 transactions · 9 stateful · 2026-05-07 13:54:09 UTC
Parallelism
80
/100
Blocked
22
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.2
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#73,037,507
· 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#3
updatePrices
#4
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#5
markGameAsLost
#6
0xeffdedb0
#7
setData
#8
execOrders
· blocks 1
#2
0x0c7abd22
#9
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
8
w0
9
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x1eb0fab5…3517
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xfe20cb8f…f03d
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xdaca243a…f9de
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xd98b3c10…67b8
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x7b6d2deb…dde0
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x38158d6c…e5d1
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0x1eb0fab556…473517
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity