← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #73,037,909
16 transactions · 13 stateful · 2026-05-07 13:56:50 UTC
Parallelism
88/100
Blocked
15%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.13
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #73,037,909 · 16 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
6w07w110w011w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x8a35acfb…d1ab
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0xe72962f6…e169
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0xe89e1a22…ce49
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x60f7fbaf…bd58
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8a35acfb…d1a8
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x0ebb6b26…f7c2
0xd32edf…ff58
3 touches
1 conflict
0xfd6388f5…216c
0x1efe02…37d6
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0099
0xaa3145…feec
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Perpl: Oracle / Operator Hub
1 conflict on slot 0x8a35acfbc1…6bd1ab
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity