← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #73,161,267
10 transactions · 10 stateful · 2026-05-08 03:37:22 UTC
Parallelism
80/100
Blocked
10%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.1
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #73,161,267 · 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
6w07w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x8a35acfb…d1aa
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0xe89e1a22…ce49
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8fa7a69c…8fd7
0x1a30b5…7777
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xe0dd419e…cfdb
0x1a30b5…7777
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x01a89030…f786
0x368ee5…7ca4
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x5b571ba0…f13a
0x368ee5…7ca4
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x68faa0b9…14af
0x368ee5…7ca4
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xcd621226…2df8
0x368ee5…7ca4
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Perpl: Oracle / Operator Hub
1 conflict on slot 0x8a35acfbc1…6bd1aa
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity