← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #73,216,131
10 transactions · 9 stateful · 2026-05-08 09:42:37 UTC
Parallelism
80/100
Blocked
11%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.1
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #73,216,131 · 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
4w05w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x8a35acfb…d1a8
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8a35acfb…d1ad
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0xcc6521c1…c892
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0xe89e1a22…ce49
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x0b390c61…dc07
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x2fda6a97…e778
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x414f2534…9e05
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x486853ad…69df
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Perpl: Oracle / Operator Hub
1 conflict on slot 0x8a35acfbc1…6bd1a8
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity