← previous blocknext block →recent activity

Analyzing

Block #73,308,269

15 transactions · 13 stateful · 2026-05-08 19:55:35 UTC

Parallelism

67/100

Blocked

62%

Avg conflicts / tx

1.2

Longest chain

5 deep

Execution timeline

did this block parallelize well?

view

block #73,308,269  ·  15 txs across 5 waves  ·  depth 5
parallel ↔ serial

wave w0

wave w1

wave w2

wave w3

wave w4

parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others

Conflict graph

Blocked by

- write/write- - read/write

x = tx position · y = wave (depth)

Hot storage slots

Contention

0xe81a95a9…25a6

0xd32edf…ff58

9 touches
10 conflicts

0xf2f76ab3…623e

0x2a68ba…90c5

8 touches
6 conflicts

0x0b390c61…dc07

0x065c9d…c394

6 touches
3 conflicts

0x00000000…003d

0x065c9d…c394

4 touches
1 conflict

0xbd7e37a9…9eb5

0x065c9d…c394

4 touches
1 conflict

0x00000000…0013

0x1b6862…e19c

2 touches
0 conflicts

0x00000000…0015

0x1b6862…e19c

2 touches
0 conflicts

0x09000000…0001

0x000000…1000

2 touches
0 conflicts

What's blocking what?

Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.

The bottleneck

Throughput-killer: 0xd32edf66…9fff58

10 conflicts on slot 0xe81a95a923…6525a6

← previous block·next block →recent activity