← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #73,475,931
8 transactions · 8 stateful · 2026-05-09 14:31:12 UTC
Parallelism
75/100
Blocked
13%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.13
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #73,475,931 · 8 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
6w07w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x8a35acfb…d1ac
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x96504a63…52d2
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x0b000000…0002
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…003d
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x2e4499b9…6d34
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x4d4bf506…43ca
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x6f08361d…bda6
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x86c663d8…35ad
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Perpl: Oracle / Operator Hub
1 conflict on slot 0x8a35acfbc1…6bd1ac
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity