← previous blocknext block →recent activity

Analyzing

Block #73,476,395

14 transactions · 13 stateful · 2026-05-09 14:34:16 UTC

Parallelism

50/100

Blocked

62%

Avg conflicts / tx

2.14

Longest chain

7 deep

Execution timeline

did this block parallelize well?

view

block #73,476,395  ·  14 txs across 7 waves  ·  depth 7
parallel ↔ serial

wave w0

wave w1

wave w2

wave w3

wave w4

wave w5

wave w6

parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others

Conflict graph

Blocked by

- write/write- - read/write

x = tx position · y = wave (depth)

Hot storage slots

Contention

0x00000000…003d

0x065c9d…c394

12 touches
15 conflicts

0x046a928e…0012

0x2a68ba…90c5

12 touches
15 conflicts

0xf537eaa0…73c8

0x065c9d…c394

10 touches
10 conflicts

0xf2f76ab3…623e

0x2a68ba…90c5

8 touches
6 conflicts

0x6f08361d…bda6

0x065c9d…c394

4 touches
1 conflict

0x72a152dd…9d0a

0x16f70c…c3dd

2 touches
0 conflicts

0x05ec384f…6e57

0x58e158…3d57

2 touches
0 conflicts

0x06090496…aa24

0x58e158…3d57

2 touches
0 conflicts

What's blocking what?

Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.

The bottleneck

Throughput-killer: 0x065c9d28…a9c394

15 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…00003d

← previous block·next block →recent activity