← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #73,478,960
12 transactions · 11 stateful · 2026-05-09 14:51:20 UTC
Parallelism
83/100
Blocked
27%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.25
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #73,478,960 · 12 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w03w14w05w06w19w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x8a35acfb…d1a8
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8a35acfb…d1ac
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x96504a63…52d2
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0xe72962f6…e169
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x0d622e34…0000
0x681e90…ae09
4 touches
1 conflict
0x17606ba6…1b6e
0x754704…b603
4 touches
1 conflict
0x60f7fbaf…bd58
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x729c91b8…9537
0x188d58…ea8e
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Perpl: Oracle / Operator Hub
1 conflict on slot 0x8a35acfbc1…6bd1a8
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity