← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #73,490,101
12 transactions · 11 stateful · 2026-05-09 16:05:36 UTC
Parallelism
83/100
Blocked
27%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.25
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #73,490,101 · 12 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
2w03w16w07w18w09w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x8a35acfb…d1ac
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…003d
0x065c9d…c394
4 touches
1 conflict
0x046a928e…0012
0x2a68ba…90c5
4 touches
1 conflict
0xf2f76ab3…623e
0x2a68ba…90c5
4 touches
1 conflict
0x462c8be7…4f83
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…000c
0x031cc3…255f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xb4e825af…69e0
0x3bd359…433a
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0000
0x116e7d…d8f1
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Perpl: Oracle / Operator Hub
1 conflict on slot 0x8a35acfbc1…6bd1ac
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity