← previous blocknext block →recent activity

Analyzing

Block #73,492,147

20 transactions · 17 stateful · 2026-05-09 16:19:10 UTC

Parallelism

60/100

Blocked

53%

Avg conflicts / tx

1.7

Longest chain

8 deep

Execution timeline

did this block parallelize well?

view

block #73,492,147  ·  20 txs across 8 waves  ·  depth 8
parallel ↔ serial

wave w0

wave w1

wave w2

wave w3

wave w4

wave w5

wave w6

wave w7

parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others

Conflict graph

Blocked by

- write/write- - read/write

x = tx position · y = wave (depth)

Hot storage slots

Contention

0x00000000…003d

0x065c9d…c394

12 touches
15 conflicts

0xf2f76ab3…623e

0x2a68ba…90c5

12 touches
15 conflicts

0x046a928e…0012

0x2a68ba…90c5

10 touches
10 conflicts

0x4d87512b…897c

0x065c9d…c394

6 touches
3 conflicts

0xb1d84059…0af2

0x065c9d…c394

3 touches
1 conflict

0x2af506e0…57df

0x065c9d…c394

3 touches
1 conflict

0x00000000…0018

0x1b6862…e19c

2 touches
0 conflicts

0x00000000…0028

0x1b6862…e19c

2 touches
0 conflicts

What's blocking what?

Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.

The bottleneck

Throughput-killer: 0x065c9d28…a9c394

15 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…00003d

← previous block·next block →recent activity