← previous blocknext block →recent activity

Analyzing

Block #73,513,353

19 transactions · 17 stateful · 2026-05-09 18:40:16 UTC

Parallelism

63/100

Blocked

53%

Avg conflicts / tx

1.26

Longest chain

7 deep

Execution timeline

did this block parallelize well?

view

block #73,513,353  ·  19 txs across 7 waves  ·  depth 7
parallel ↔ serial

wave w0

wave w1

wave w2

wave w3

wave w4

wave w5

wave w6

parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others

Conflict graph

Blocked by

- write/write- - read/write

x = tx position · y = wave (depth)

Hot storage slots

Contention

0xf2f76ab3…623e

0x2a68ba…90c5

10 touches
10 conflicts

0x4d87512b…897c

0x065c9d…c394

10 touches
10 conflicts

0x00000000…003d

0x065c9d…c394

8 touches
6 conflicts

0x22e295f5…1bef

0x065c9d…c394

8 touches
6 conflicts

0x046a928e…0012

0x2a68ba…90c5

6 touches
3 conflicts

0x4af036d2…be8b

0x065c9d…c394

4 touches
1 conflict

0x6f2f9b8a…6423

0xd32edf…ff58

3 touches
1 conflict

0x00000000…0013

0x1b6862…e19c

2 touches
0 conflicts

What's blocking what?

Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.

The bottleneck

Throughput-killer: Kuru Exchange: MarginAccount

10 conflicts on slot 0xf2f76ab392…f3623e

← previous block·next block →recent activity