← previous blocknext block →recent activity

Analyzing

Block #73,650,507

24 transactions · 19 stateful · 2026-05-10 09:54:35 UTC

Parallelism

75/100

Blocked

68%

Avg conflicts / tx

1.21

Longest chain

6 deep

Execution timeline

did this block parallelize well?

view

block #73,650,507  ·  24 txs across 6 waves  ·  depth 6
parallel ↔ serial

wave w0

wave w1

wave w2

wave w3

wave w4

wave w5

parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others

Conflict graph

Blocked by

- write/write- - read/write

x = tx position · y = wave (depth)

Hot storage slots

Contention

0x5e2b0cdf…0425

0xd32edf…ff58

11 touches
15 conflicts

0x046a928e…0012

0x2a68ba…90c5

8 touches
6 conflicts

0xf2f76ab3…623e

0x2a68ba…90c5

6 touches
3 conflicts

0x7f81fb82…633e

0x065c9d…c394

6 touches
3 conflicts

0x17606ba6…1b6e

0x754704…b603

4 touches
1 conflict

0x01e7b865…6e6f

0x188d58…ea8e

4 touches
1 conflict

0x15d039e7…4bb6

0x34b655…2a6f

4 touches
1 conflict

0xb159af88…a9e7

0x065c9d…c394

4 touches
1 conflict

What's blocking what?

Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.

The bottleneck

Throughput-killer: 0xd32edf66…9fff58

15 conflicts on slot 0x5e2b0cdf25…ca0425

← previous block·next block →recent activity