← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #73,674,398
9 transactions · 9 stateful · 2026-05-10 12:35:46 UTC
Parallelism
78/100
Blocked
22%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.22
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #73,674,398 · 9 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
4w05w18w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x8a35acfb…d1ab
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0xe89e1a22…ce49
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x3e733ae4…4598
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x1f204c52…e21e
0x0555e3…2b9c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x53d60b23…dc15
0x0555e3…2b9c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…003d
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x0ac31945…2c72
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x8b3f3eb2…7ee1
0x3bd359…433a
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Perpl: Oracle / Operator Hub
1 conflict on slot 0x8a35acfbc1…6bd1ab
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity