← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #73,680,434
9 transactions · 7 stateful · 2026-05-10 13:16:35 UTC
Parallelism
78/100
Blocked
29%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.22
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #73,680,434 · 9 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w15w06w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x8a35acfb…d1ab
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0xe96c91d2…32ff
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0xee025cc9…f468
0xd32edf…ff58
3 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…003d
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x0ac31945…2c72
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x371682fd…8073
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x529acb6a…fcc6
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xfed19979…beaa
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Perpl: Oracle / Operator Hub
1 conflict on slot 0x8a35acfbc1…6bd1ab
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity