← previous blocknext block →recent activity

Analyzing

Block #73,682,936

20 transactions · 16 stateful · 2026-05-10 13:33:29 UTC

Parallelism

70/100

Blocked

38%

Avg conflicts / tx

0.7

Longest chain

6 deep

Execution timeline

did this block parallelize well?

view

block #73,682,936  ·  20 txs across 6 waves  ·  depth 6
parallel ↔ serial

wave w0

wave w1

wave w2

wave w3

wave w4

wave w5

parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others

Conflict graph

Blocked by

- write/write- - read/write

x = tx position · y = wave (depth)

Hot storage slots

Contention

0x0ac31945…2c72

0x065c9d…c394

10 touches
10 conflicts

0xf2f76ab3…623e

0x2a68ba…90c5

10 touches
10 conflicts

0x00000000…003d

0x065c9d…c394

6 touches
3 conflicts

0x046a928e…0012

0x2a68ba…90c5

4 touches
1 conflict

0x0d622e34…0000

0x681e90…ae09

4 touches
1 conflict

0x0dba7c56…5e9b

0x34b655…2a6f

2 touches
0 conflicts

0x157b6348…8604

0x34b655…2a6f

2 touches
0 conflicts

0x1b6ebaf2…2688

0x34b655…2a6f

2 touches
0 conflicts

What's blocking what?

Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.

The bottleneck

Throughput-killer: 0x065c9d28…a9c394

10 conflicts on slot 0x0ac3194537…8f2c72

← previous block·next block →recent activity