← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #73,694,734
6 transactions · 5 stateful · 2026-05-10 14:52:57 UTC
Parallelism
67/100
Blocked
20%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.17
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #73,694,734 · 6 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xe96c91d2…32ff
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8a35acfb…d1ab
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8db1e0f2…2fcf
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x908d4442…2c4b
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xa9988419…9f45
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xac8e97a0…8426
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xecd87a39…d9c5
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x143dba04…1b98
0x8d66a4…3095
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Perpl: Oracle / Operator Hub
1 conflict on slot 0xe96c91d2d9…0132ff
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity