← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #73,696,764
8 transactions · 7 stateful · 2026-05-10 15:06:35 UTC
Parallelism
50/100
Blocked
43%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.75
Longest chain
4 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #73,696,764 · 8 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
2w03w14w25w3
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x8a35acfb…d1ab
0x8d66a4…3095
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x60f7fbaf…bd58
0x34b655…2a6f
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xe96c91d2…32ff
0x8d66a4…3095
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x8a35acfb…d1a6
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8a35acfb…d1a8
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8a35acfb…d1aa
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x143dba04…1b98
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0xe72962f6…e169
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Perpl: Oracle / Operator Hub
6 conflicts on slot 0x8a35acfbc1…6bd1ab
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity