← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #73,696,790
17 transactions · 14 stateful · 2026-05-10 15:06:46 UTC
Parallelism
88/100
Blocked
7%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.06
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #73,696,790 · 17 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
10w011w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xe96c91d2…32ff
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8a35acfb…d1ab
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x0b000000…0002
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x8db1e0f2…2fcf
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x908d4442…2c4b
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xac8e97a0…8426
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xcce2fd99…a8eb
0x3bd359…433a
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x2b36ecc6…093e
0x3c2269…cf62
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Perpl: Oracle / Operator Hub
1 conflict on slot 0xe96c91d2d9…0132ff
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity