← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #73,697,055
14 transactions · 13 stateful · 2026-05-10 15:08:34 UTC
Parallelism
64/100
Blocked
54%
Avg conflicts / tx
1
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #73,697,055 · 14 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w13w24w36w07w18w211w413w2
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x529acb6a…fcc6
0x065c9d…c394
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x0a85a226…83be
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x9bab6496…d2aa
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…003d
0x065c9d…c394
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…001c
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000015
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity