← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #73,860,105
10 transactions · 9 stateful · 2026-05-11 09:23:52 UTC
Parallelism
60/100
Blocked
44%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.7
Longest chain
4 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #73,860,105 · 10 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
3w04w15w26w38w09w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0018
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xcb45d9d6…cb80
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x69ab888c…5ae7
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xb159af88…a9e7
0x065c9d…c394
4 touches
1 conflict
0xd98b3c10…67b8
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xa3a2f50d…ffdd
0x065c9d…c394
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000018
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity