pev
.
One block, wave by wave
→
analytics
docs
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes →
pev
/
block
/
#73,918,892
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #73,918,892
23 transactions · 20 stateful · 2026-05-11 15:55:35 UTC
Parallelism
65
/100
Blocked
45
%
Avg conflicts / tx
1.35
Longest chain
8
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#73,918,892
· 23 txs across 8 waves · depth 8
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
wave
w5
wave
w6
wave
w7
#0
syscallReward
#1
execute
#2
revealWithCallback
#3
addLiquidity
#4
0x40e79b1b
#5
0x98717539
#6
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#7
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#8
0x0c7abd22
#9
0x5339c59f
· blocks 4
#10
0x5339c59f
· blocks 5
#20
setData
#21
0x6a01fc6f
#22
0x39435dac
#11
0x5339c59f
· blocks 3
#12
0x5339c59f
· blocks 4
#13
0x5339c59f
· blocks 2
#14
0x5339c59f
· blocks 3
#15
0xed82b078
· blocks 4
#16
0xed82b078
· blocks 3
#17
0xed82b078
· blocks 2
#18
0xed82b078
· blocks 1
#19
0xed82b078
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
9
w0
10
w0
11
w1
12
w1
13
w2
14
w2
15
w3
16
w4
17
w5
18
w6
19
w7
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xf537eaa0…73c8
0x065c9d…c394
12 touches
15 conflicts
0x046a928e…0012
0x2a68ba…90c5
12 touches
15 conflicts
0x00000000…003d
0x065c9d…c394
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x6f08361d…bda6
0x065c9d…c394
10 touches
10 conflicts
0xf2f76ab3…623e
0x2a68ba…90c5
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x46cb45de…a566
0x188d58…ea8e
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x46cb45de…a567
0x188d58…ea8e
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x46cb45de…a569
0x188d58…ea8e
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
0x065c9d28…a9c394
15 conflicts on slot
0xf537eaa0c6…3873c8
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity