← previous blocknext block →recent activity

Analyzing

Block #74,026,110

10 transactions · 8 stateful · 2026-05-12 03:51:35 UTC

Parallelism

70/100

Blocked

50%

Avg conflicts / tx

0.6

Longest chain

3 deep

Execution timeline

did this block parallelize well?

view

block #74,026,110  ·  10 txs across 3 waves  ·  depth 3
parallel ↔ serial

wave w0

wave w1

wave w2

parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others

Conflict graph

Blocked by

- write/write- - read/write

x = tx position · y = wave (depth)

Hot storage slots

Contention

0x00000000…003d

0x065c9d…c394

6 touches
3 conflicts

0x4eba50ea…85b9

0x065c9d…c394

4 touches
1 conflict

0x046a928e…0012

0x2a68ba…90c5

4 touches
1 conflict

0xbd7e37a9…9eb5

0x065c9d…c394

4 touches
1 conflict

0x30276c1c…47b4

0x2a68ba…90c5

4 touches
1 conflict

0x05d8322e…60a3

0x065c9d…c394

3 touches
1 conflict

0xc90626fb…a729

0x065c9d…c394

3 touches
1 conflict

0x00000000…001b

0x1b6862…e19c

2 touches
0 conflicts

What's blocking what?

Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.

The bottleneck

Throughput-killer: 0x065c9d28…a9c394

3 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…00003d

← previous block·next block →recent activity