← previous blocknext block →recent activity

Analyzing

Block #74,040,516

10 transactions · 7 stateful · 2026-05-12 05:27:15 UTC

Parallelism

80/100

Blocked

29%

Avg conflicts / tx

0.2

Longest chain

2 deep

Execution timeline

did this block parallelize well?

view

block #74,040,516  ·  10 txs across 2 waves  ·  depth 2
parallel ↔ serial

wave w0

wave w1

parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others

Conflict graph

Blocked by

- write/write- - read/write

x = tx position · y = wave (depth)

Hot storage slots

Contention

0xf1644ea1…d7ab

0x065c9d…c394

4 touches
1 conflict

0x00000000…003d

0x065c9d…c394

4 touches
1 conflict

0x0b390c61…dc07

0x065c9d…c394

4 touches
1 conflict

0x4cb19272…ad82

0x065c9d…c394

3 touches
1 conflict

0x2c622495…4020

0x065c9d…c394

3 touches
1 conflict

0xc527a6e5…4383

0x065c9d…c394

2 touches
0 conflicts

0x30276c1c…47b4

0x2a68ba…90c5

2 touches
0 conflicts

0x765c236f…ff45

0x2a68ba…90c5

2 touches
0 conflicts

What's blocking what?

Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.

The bottleneck

Throughput-killer: 0x065c9d28…a9c394

1 conflict on slot 0xf1644ea1e2…28d7ab

← previous block·next block →recent activity