← previous blocknext block →recent activity

Analyzing

Block #74,197,044

5 transactions · 4 stateful · 2026-05-12 22:48:46 UTC

Parallelism

60/100

Blocked

25%

Avg conflicts / tx

0.2

Longest chain

2 deep

Execution timeline

did this block parallelize well?

view

block #74,197,044  ·  5 txs across 2 waves  ·  depth 2
parallel ↔ serial

wave w0

wave w1

parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others

Conflict graph

Blocked by

- write/write- - read/write

x = tx position · y = wave (depth)

Hot storage slots

Contention

0x00000000…0015

0x1b6862…e19c

4 touches
1 conflict

0x00000000…0013

0x1b6862…e19c

4 touches
1 conflict

0x14d1bf0e…e09f

0x1b6862…e19c

4 touches
1 conflict

0x30276c1c…47b4

0x2a68ba…90c5

4 touches
1 conflict

0xb8203ac8…1482

0x065c9d…c394

3 touches
1 conflict

0x85514426…372d

0xd32edf…ff58

3 touches
1 conflict

0xaba1c874…f679

0x065c9d…c394

2 touches
0 conflicts

0xb2bda108…6927

0x065c9d…c394

2 touches
0 conflicts

What's blocking what?

Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.

The bottleneck

Throughput-killer: 0x1b68626d…2de19c

1 conflict on slot 0x0000000000…000015

← previous block·next block →recent activity