← previous blocknext block →recent activity

Analyzing

Block #74,204,756

10 transactions · 9 stateful · 2026-05-12 23:39:59 UTC

Parallelism

80/100

Blocked

33%

Avg conflicts / tx

0.4

Longest chain

2 deep

Execution timeline

did this block parallelize well?

view

block #74,204,756  ·  10 txs across 2 waves  ·  depth 2
parallel ↔ serial

wave w0

wave w1

parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others

Conflict graph

Blocked by

- write/write- - read/write

x = tx position · y = wave (depth)

Hot storage slots

Contention

0x00000000…003d

0x065c9d…c394

4 touches
1 conflict

0xf2f76ab3…623e

0x2a68ba…90c5

4 touches
1 conflict

0x214dc988…ba27

0x34b655…2a6f

4 touches
1 conflict

0x60f7fbaf…bd58

0x34b655…2a6f

4 touches
1 conflict

0xac2a0273…721b

0x34b655…2a6f

4 touches
1 conflict

0xd98b3c10…67b8

0x34b655…2a6f

4 touches
1 conflict

0xf823e97f…2ee6

0x065c9d…c394

2 touches
0 conflicts

0x46cb45de…a566

0x188d58…ea8e

2 touches
0 conflicts

What's blocking what?

Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.

The bottleneck

Throughput-killer: 0x065c9d28…a9c394

1 conflict on slot 0x0000000000…00003d

← previous block·next block →recent activity