← previous blocknext block →recent activity

Analyzing

Block #74,335,770

39 transactions · 25 stateful · 2026-05-13 14:11:14 UTC

Parallelism

82/100

Blocked

56%

Avg conflicts / tx

1.08

Longest chain

7 deep

Execution timeline

did this block parallelize well?

view

block #74,335,770  ·  39 txs across 7 waves  ·  depth 7
parallel ↔ serial

wave w0

wave w1

wave w2

wave w3

wave w4

wave w5

wave w6

parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others

Conflict graph

Blocked by

- write/write- - read/write

x = tx position · y = wave (depth)

Hot storage slots

Contention

0xc16db202…921c

0xd32edf…ff58

13 touches
21 conflicts

0xd98b3c10…67b8

0x34b655…2a6f

12 touches
15 conflicts

0xea02471d…1542

0x34b655…2a6f

8 touches
6 conflicts

0xf3981be5…2c47

0x34b655…2a6f

8 touches
6 conflicts

0x17606ba6…1b6e

0x754704…b603

6 touches
3 conflicts

0xf3d10975…0d07

0x34b655…2a6f

6 touches
3 conflicts

0xe5e7089a…fb91

0x34b655…2a6f

6 touches
3 conflicts

0xeebd31ac…0794

0x34b655…2a6f

6 touches
3 conflicts

What's blocking what?

Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.

The bottleneck

Throughput-killer: 0xd32edf66…9fff58

21 conflicts on slot 0xc16db20210…7f921c

← previous block·next block →recent activity