← previous blocknext block →recent activity

Analyzing

Block #74,504,199

10 transactions · 9 stateful · 2026-05-14 08:52:23 UTC

Parallelism

80/100

Blocked

11%

Avg conflicts / tx

0.1

Longest chain

2 deep

Execution timeline

did this block parallelize well?

view

block #74,504,199  ·  10 txs across 2 waves  ·  depth 2
parallel ↔ serial

wave w0

wave w1

parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others

Conflict graph

Blocked by

- write/write- - read/write

x = tx position · y = wave (depth)

Hot storage slots

Contention

0xb38b127f…f0e5

0x699abc…6a3b

4 touches
1 conflict

0xcf89feb2…be11

0x699abc…6a3b

4 touches
1 conflict

0xa1087a5c…66c4

0x754704…b603

4 touches
1 conflict

0x335a161d…fe7f

0x000000…012a

4 touches
1 conflict

0x5c8c6ab6…dc36

0x065c9d…c394

2 touches
0 conflicts

0x00000000…0012

0x1b6862…e19c

2 touches
0 conflicts

0x00000000…0013

0x1b6862…e19c

2 touches
0 conflicts

0x00000000…0015

0x1b6862…e19c

2 touches
0 conflicts

What's blocking what?

Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.

The bottleneck

Throughput-killer: 0x699abc15…c86a3b

1 conflict on slot 0xb38b127f1d…b9f0e5

← previous block·next block →recent activity