← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #74,510,495
9 transactions · 6 stateful · 2026-05-14 09:34:48 UTC
Parallelism
78/100
Blocked
17%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.11
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #74,510,495 · 9 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
2w04w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xf0cb6abd…a52d
0xa7283d…0ace
4 touches
1 conflict
0xf0cb6abd…a52e
0xa7283d…0ace
4 touches
1 conflict
0xf0cb6abd…a52f
0xa7283d…0ace
4 touches
1 conflict
0xf0cb6abd…a530
0xa7283d…0ace
4 touches
1 conflict
0xa472d565…9fe4
0x3bd359…433a
4 touches
1 conflict
0x536e2740…61ac
0x3bd359…433a
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8fa7a69c…8fd7
0xb72e62…7777
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0002
0xa7283d…0ace
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Nad.fun: BONDING_CURVE
1 conflict on slot 0xf0cb6abd8c…a7a52d
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity