← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #74,671,605
11 transactions · 9 stateful · 2026-05-15 03:34:57 UTC
Parallelism
82/100
Blocked
33%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.27
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #74,671,605 · 11 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w16w07w18w09w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xba5743c7…21bf
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x60f7fbaf…bd58
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x0d622e34…0000
0x681e90…ae09
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x4c4edb51…cb10
0xd32edf…ff58
3 touches
1 conflict
0x8876d94c…8435
0x2a68ba…90c5
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x09000000…0001
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
1 conflict on slot 0x0000000000…000015
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity