← previous blocknext block →recent activity

Analyzing

Block #74,781,849

20 transactions · 14 stateful · 2026-05-15 15:51:14 UTC

Parallelism

90/100

Blocked

29%

Avg conflicts / tx

0.2

Longest chain

2 deep

Execution timeline

did this block parallelize well?

view

block #74,781,849  ·  20 txs across 2 waves  ·  depth 2
parallel ↔ serial

wave w0

wave w1

parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others

Conflict graph

Blocked by

- write/write- - read/write

x = tx position · y = wave (depth)

Hot storage slots

Contention

0x60f7fbaf…bd58

0x34b655…2a6f

4 touches
1 conflict

0xe6455d1f…1029

0x754704…b603

4 touches
1 conflict

0x0d0b2509…074d

0x3bd359…433a

4 touches
1 conflict

0x9fc6ea79…e2dc

0x34b655…2a6f

4 touches
1 conflict

0x26a9739a…6849

0xd32edf…ff58

3 touches
1 conflict

0xf3d7a307…4d63

0x065c9d…c394

2 touches
0 conflicts

0x00000000…0007

0x09f880…ede0

2 touches
0 conflicts

0x00000000…000a

0x09f880…ede0

2 touches
0 conflicts

What's blocking what?

Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.

The bottleneck

Throughput-killer: 0x34b6552d…112a6f

1 conflict on slot 0x60f7fbaf90…97bd58

← previous block·next block →recent activity