← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #74,782,992
16 transactions · 14 stateful · 2026-05-15 15:58:54 UTC
Parallelism
88/100
Blocked
21%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.19
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #74,782,992 · 16 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w09w110w111w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x4d42f16e…a6c8
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x046a928e…0012
0x2a68ba…90c5
4 touches
1 conflict
0x1dc0dec4…7585
0xd32edf…ff58
3 touches
1 conflict
0x63e6e873…4306
0x065c9d…c394
3 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…000d
0x06d045…f107
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x26c1a20b…36f4
0x111111…db61
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
1 conflict on slot 0x0000000000…000015
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity