← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #74,898,059
10 transactions · 8 stateful · 2026-05-16 04:46:24 UTC
Parallelism
80/100
Blocked
13%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.1
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #74,898,059 · 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
2w03w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x50e10826…843b
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8a35acfb…d1aa
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8a35acfb…d1ab
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0xc009105d…96f7
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0xa9988419…9f45
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xab981df1…2941
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xfe39a1f7…8eb0
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0036
0x386489…7508
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Perpl: Oracle / Operator Hub
1 conflict on slot 0x50e1082618…a8843b
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity