pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#74,901,799
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #74,901,799
9 transactions · 7 stateful · 2026-05-16 05:11:23 UTC
Parallelism
78
/100
Blocked
14
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.11
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#74,901,799
· 9 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x1ffa3c9b
#2
0x98717539
· blocks 1
#3
0xed82b078
#4
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#5
0x6a07fcf2
#6
setData
#8
execOrders
#7
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
2
w0
7
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xea02471d…1542
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xf06c2cf5…61bd
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xf3d10975…0d07
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x9fc6ea79…e2dc
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8f1e1437…50a9
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xe8b3ac1a…8303
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xfe2bac2b…2cec
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x30276c1c…47b4
0x2a68ba…90c5
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0xea02471df2…601542
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity