← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #75,162,780
8 transactions · 3 stateful · 2026-05-17 10:14:45 UTC
Parallelism
75/100
Blocked
33%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.13
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #75,162,780 · 8 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x8a35acfb…d1a9
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x50e10826…843b
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0xc009105d…96f7
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8a35acfb…d1a8
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x4118bd12…924a
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x664bf99e…0a8c
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x7cb2f3fa…4836
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x86cea35b…bdff
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Perpl: Oracle / Operator Hub
1 conflict on slot 0x8a35acfbc1…6bd1a9
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity