← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #75,516,650
16 transactions · 12 stateful · 2026-05-19 01:46:35 UTC
Parallelism
88/100
Blocked
33%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.25
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #75,516,650 · 16 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w13w04w05w18w114w015w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x50e10826…843b
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0xc009105d…96f7
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8a35acfb…d1a8
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…003d
0x065c9d…c394
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0019
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Perpl: Oracle / Operator Hub
1 conflict on slot 0x50e1082618…a8843b
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity