← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #75,534,344
10 transactions · 9 stateful · 2026-05-19 03:45:55 UTC
Parallelism
80/100
Blocked
11%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.1
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #75,534,344 · 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
4w05w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xc009105d…96f7
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x50e10826…843b
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8a35acfb…d1aa
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8a35acfb…d1ab
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0019
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0029
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Perpl: Oracle / Operator Hub
1 conflict on slot 0xc009105db3…e996f7
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity