← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #75,893,614
10 transactions · 8 stateful · 2026-05-20 19:41:38 UTC
Parallelism
80/100
Blocked
13%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.1
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #75,893,614 · 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x8a35acfb…d1a2
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x60f7fbaf…bd58
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x893cd52c…5766
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x9d1bb389…c7d9
0x8d66a4…3095
3 touches
1 conflict
0x1550e185…0b12
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x313f2565…5b00
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x336241b2…c1db
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x664bf99e…0a8c
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Perpl: Oracle / Operator Hub
1 conflict on slot 0x8a35acfbc1…6bd1a2
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity